Kelly and I went to a great tasting last week at HASR in Chinatown and had some decent value-driven California wines from Morgan and Bishop's Peak. I keep forgetting the name of the guy who pours there on Tuesday and Friday nights but he is extremely nice, knowledgeable, and efficient. The holy trinity of attributes for anyone working in a tasting room.
The 2011 Morgan Sauvignon Blanc was probably the star of the show with a surprisingly big body for the varietal and its clean, minerally, and old world flavor profile. It is blended with small amounts Sauvignon Musque and Semillon as well as spends 6 months in mostly neutral oak to lend complexity and texture. The 2011 Chardonnay from Bishop's Peak was lighter in body and color and had an extremely closed nose. It had nice light clean citrus flavors but not much else to write home about.
BP's Pinot was temptingly priced at $20 and had a plump body with well-rounded tannins and true to the varietal rustic cherry flavors. The Cabernet was also dominated by simple cherry notes on the front end that fell off too quickly. It also had a bit too much oak and heat for me. Finally, the Morgan rhone-style "cote du crow's" blend was much rounder and heavier on the palate with riper darker fruit. There were some tertiary bitter subtle vinegary notes on the mid-palate that for some reason I was into.
I would definitely recommend the free bi-weekly tastings at HASR. And if you see a short dorky-looking haole scribbling tasting notes in the corner, say hi!
Showing posts with label sauvignon blanc. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sauvignon blanc. Show all posts
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Pierre Chainier, "1749" Sauvignon Blanc, 2011, Loire, France
This is a tale of two wines . . two entirely different wines in the same bottle. The first Sauvignon Blanc you down ice cold within the first ten minutes of being open. Though it claims to be from the Loire, it smells like something more from New Zealand with its fruit forward lime, wet grass, meringue, and a hint of florality. It's rather round on the front end with a nice crunchy acid attack on the mid palate. The initial lively tart citrus notes seamlessly flow into more richer apple pastry on the finish. You struck by its complexity for the teenage price point and want to taste more and more and more from this so called Pierre Chainier.
The second wine shows up a mere 10 minutes later. It's just a hint warmer but somehow almost all of the acidity and balance has faded away. The brightness and length also seem to be taken out back and shot like a lame horse. Fuck, it's like straigh up welches peach juice! Is something wrong with my ragged 36 year old taste buds? Is this tiny rock of an island driving me crazy? Please drink some of this for me and let me know what this wine shows up for you!
The second wine shows up a mere 10 minutes later. It's just a hint warmer but somehow almost all of the acidity and balance has faded away. The brightness and length also seem to be taken out back and shot like a lame horse. Fuck, it's like straigh up welches peach juice! Is something wrong with my ragged 36 year old taste buds? Is this tiny rock of an island driving me crazy? Please drink some of this for me and let me know what this wine shows up for you!
Saturday, December 15, 2012
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Horse Heaven Vineyard Sauvignon Blanc, 2010, Horse Heaven Hills, Washington
The big wine mags scored this gem in the high eighties and if I cared about such things, this wine would definitely cross that magic 90 point finish line. True to form, it's got a water-like color with just a touch of golden rim. The typical grapefruit notes are apparent on the nose but I also detected a nice touch of barnyard, french vanilla ice cream, and orange blossom. The red grapefruit also rocks the palate along with sour apple and cucumber. It lacks the grassiness of a New Zealand Sauvignon but has a lot more ripe fruit compared to anything from France. A touch of oak adds complexity and body without taking away from the fresh varietal character. I don't think anyone would mistake this for a Chardonnay but I do think people might mistake it for a far more expensive wine. Coming in at the mid-teens, this wine has a nice balance and surprising structure for the price-point.
P.S For all my Portland peeps . . . if you find yourself among all the great little tasting rooms in Woodinville, I think Chateau Ste. Michelle is one of the few larger commercial wineries that is worth a visit. Wild peacocks wander the property and they have a huge line up of single vineyard and higher end wines to taste.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
a jaunt to a few wineries in newberg and carlton
The 2007 Washington Riesling didn’t fair much better. Its nose reeked of laughing gas and the inside of a balloon with a hint of confectionary sugar. The awkwardness of the nose carried through on the body. Finally, the sweet Riesling with fruit from Eola-Amity Hills had a nose like gummy candy and mashed over-ripe peaches. Its touch of acidity and understated sweetness gave it a better balance than the other two efforts but it was still nothing to write home about.
The only Pinots on the tasting menu were from the 2004 vintage. The staff admitted that it was an extremely difficult vintage and that the grapes got picked a little later than they would have liked. He further explained that they tried to make up for the watered down flavor profile with exposing the grapes to more oak. There was a Willamette valley pinot as well as a single vineyard designate from the Aubre Vert vineyard. Both the wines were still alive and vibrant but without a doubt overly-oaked. They had a crimson color with hints of brown beginning to take over on the edges. The smells reminded me of smoke from a BBQ with hints of smoked cheese and a bit of cherry. The wines did have a silky big body for such a rainy vintage probably imparted by the oak. Nora said they tasted like an oak sponge. I got beef jerky, tar, and bitter fruit as well.
The 2005 Washington Merlot was probably the best of all. It also had a big punchy nose with English garden rose, chocolate cake, red fruits, and a hefty dose of alcohol. It was a rather simple wine with an explosion of strawberry on the front end and a white pepper tinged acidity with a fairly short finish. There was a fair amount of burning alcohol on the end as well.
A pair of 2008 entry level Pinot Noirs from the Columbia Valley had pleasant dark fruit flavors with toned down acids while still remaining balanced and lean. Next up was a 2002 and 2003 estate block designate Pinots from Medici. Time in the bottle had rounded out the tannins beautifully and brought to the foreground hints of spice and caramel. Still the cherry fruit notes were lively as ever. The 2003 block 1 and 2 designate was my favorite wine of the bunch with its abundance and purity of fruit. It’s a great value at $30 and will drink well for at least another 5 years. The Columbia Valley Cab-based wines from Ferraro and Sineann were all about candied and sweet pastry fruit. Still they were fairly elegant for the price point.
Trisaetum Vineyards is a fairly new project based in the Carlton AVA. They have gotten a lot of buzz recently for their Rieslings. A 94 point rating from Wine Enthusiast for their twenty some dollar 2008 release had me excited. Though it wasn’t quite up to the hype, I was still impressed with how open the wine already had become with layers of ripe lemon and pear fruit and spice. The tasting staff gave us a sneak peak of the 2009 dry Riesling which was still quite tight and lean but showed good potential. We tasted an entry level 2008 Pinot as wells as a 2008 artist series (barrel select) and a higher end 2007. As so often is the case, I was most impressed by the entry level with its wet stone and brambly fruit notes on the nose. Those same notes came through on the flavor profile as well as a strong dose of anise. It had a medium body and a nice long finish with those seamless fruit flavors carrying through to the end.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)